Forensic DNA typing dispute

Forensic DNA Typing: Quo Vadis?

Since Alec Jeffreys coined the term “individual-specific genetic fingerprints” in 1985, DNA typing has become indispensable in forensic analysis, having as its central rationale the evidential power of the “match” between trace evidence and suspect. Established technological advances in this field include the adoption of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to generate DNA profiles from minute b...

The utility of DNA typing in forensic work.

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...

Subpopulation heterogeneity and statistical unreliability in forensic DNA typing

Human tandem repeat sequences in forensic DNA typing.

It has been 20 years since the first development of DNA fingerprinting and the start of forensic DNA typing. Ever since, human tandem repeat DNA sequences have been the main targets for forensic DNA analysis. These repeat sequences are classified into minisatellites (or VNTRs) and microsatellites (or STRs). In this brief review, we discuss the historical and current forensic applications of suc...

Disease-Induced Anomalous Human Microsatellite DNA - Implication in Forensic DNA Typing.

Short tandem repeat (STR) markers adopted for forensic applications are generally stable and have been proved effective for the analysis of many archival pathology specimens and postmortem tissues. However, recent studies on STR typing of cancerous samples have shown misinterpreted profiles caused by two types of genetic alterations in tumor materials: microsatellite instability (MSI, contracti...